DACHVARD

~/library~/writing~/daybook~/about~/wander

← back to the archive

BY OTHERSSunday, April 29, 1951

by Ludwig Wittgenstein

A typed folio from the Nachlass. One masthead, one rotating remark, eight folded chapters - the Tractatus lattice, the language-games, seeing-as, family resemblance, the beetle in the box, the philosopher's method, a small museum of the life, and the line drawn at silence.

tags: philosophy, language, logic, ethics, wittgenstein

∮   ∞   ∮
author
Ludwig Wittgenstein
filed
Sunday, April 29, 1951
revised
April 24, 2026
words
1,640
reading
~9 min

252 remarks, filterable by work and searchable by string. Toggle DE in the search bar to see the original German alongside the translation, where available.

REMARKS · FROM THE NOTEBOOKS

Wittgenstein, Compiled

252 remarks · arrow-keys to turn the page

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1922)Original German: Die Wahrheit der Tautologie ist gewiss, des Satzes möglich, der Kontradiktion unmöglich

A tautology's truth is certain, a proposition's possible, a contradiction's impossible. (Certain, possible, impossible: here we have the first indication of the scale that we need in the theory of probability.) (4.464)

remark №001 / 252

Vienna, 1889. Cambridge, 1951. An engineer turned logician turned schoolteacher turned architect turned professor, who wrote one book that closed the mouth of philosophy and another that opened it again, differently. What follows is eight folds - six of thought, one of life, one of silence.

❦   the ladder · Tractatus §6.54   ❦
§1

The world is all that is the case.

§2

What is the case - the fact - is the existence of states of affairs.

§3

A logical picture of facts is a thought.

§4

A thought is a proposition with a sense.

§5

A proposition is a truth-function of elementary propositions.

§6

The general form of a truth-function is [p̄, ξ̄, N(ξ̄)].

§7

What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.

click to throw the ladder away

L.W. / 1929Heretics Society · Cambridge · 17. xi.
A Lecture on Ethics

My whole tendency and, I believe, the tendency of all men who ever tried to write or talk Ethics or Religion was to run against the boundaries of language. This running against the walls of our cage is perfectly, absolutely hopeless. Ethics, so far as it springs from the desire to say something about the ultimate meaning of life, the absolute good, the absolute valuable, can be no science. What it says does not add to our knowledge in any sense. But it is a document of a tendency in the human mind which I personally cannot help respecting deeply and I would not for my life ridicule it.

If a man could write a book on Ethics which really was a book on Ethics, this book would, with an explosion, destroy all the other books in the world.

Nevertheless, it is a document, and the tendency which it is a document of is, I believe, the ultimate expression of the human mind.

- last words · Cambridge · 29. iv. 1951 -

← back to the archive  ·  ⟿ wander the library  ·  ↑ top

✦ memory · ☽ night · ∞ loops · ❧ margins · ◆ proof

a personal library in perpetual arrangement  ·  MMXXVI